Friday, October 29, 2010

FINISH DISCUSSION OF INTERNET DEBATES - QUESTIONS DUE TUES - vector v bitmap

 Is democracy threatened by the unchecked nature of the internet

NO:
jimmy wales- co founded wikipedia (with ex partner and larry sanger)
Micah Sifry COFOUNDER OF http://personaldemocracy.com/
VS
YES:
Andrew Keen
Farhad Manjoo - journalist from slate.com  Farhad Manjoo's page on the Internet


A series of questions (based on information from the Debates watched in class, and on the readings from Keen's book "cult of the amateur" are due as a Blog Posting by November 2nd. Include links or references to reinforce your answers.

  • Please cut and paste each question in to your blog, and type your answer to each one below the question.
1. Based on this debate and previous readings What Definition of democracy do you feel is most fitting for us to use in-conjunction our growing reliance and integration of digital networked technologies?


2. How does your answer to #1 fit into the unchecked nature of Web 2.0 technologies, and what are some tangible examples of this? Do you feel this is an important issue that needs to be addressed further?


3. Define and describe the phenomenon of the Media echo-chamber as described in the Internet Debates. What are some examples of this silo effect, and do you believe it is an issue that needs to be addressed? Why or Why not?


4. What are some ways that expertise and authority could be (or is being) enforced on the internet? Who would be behind these forces? Why do you believe are they are needed or not needed?


6. Give a through example of an adaptation or improvement made by a of a social, political, or cultural group, government, business or individual to keep up with changing nature of the internet.

7. Is democracy threatened by the unchecked nature of the internet?




MAYBE TIME TO START NEW VECTOR GRAPHIC PRODUCTION TECHNIQUES IN ADOBE ILLUSTRATOR ;)

Friday, October 22, 2010

Debate: The Internet and Democracy

recap on the culture of appropriation

then we can finally watch debates from May, 2010.

Debate: The Internet and Democracy
Miller Center of Public Affairs

It Is Easy to Ignore Facts Online

Authority Can Exist on the Internet
No Expertise on Wikipedia or Expertise No Curators
Free Information has greater transparancy

You will be using the information from this video and in class to write a case study of your own eventually on Open Source--Sharing V. Stealing... so, its important to pay attention

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

the debate over web 2.0

 TACTICAL MEDIA ART -- CASE STUDY


INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED AUTONOMY
GRAFFITI RESEARCH LAB - L.A.Z.E.R. TAG

PITTSBURGH'S DEEP LOCAL


_________________________


Andrew Keen: "Web 2.0 is Fucked!"
Keen is caught after a few too many cocktails at a conference on networked technologies



Debate: The Internet and Democracy
Miller Center of Public Affairs

It Is Easy to Ignore Facts Online

Authority Can Exist on the Internet
No Expertise on Wikipedia or Expertise No Curators
Free Information has greater transparancy

IN CONTRAST TO Rushkoff's new book:

Program or be Programmed

Ten Commands for a Digital Age
Douglas Rushkoff

The Commands are not commandments, meant as orders from God to a population, but rather ways of taking command of any of the biases of digital media. The way to take command of digital media’s asynchronous bias, for example, is not to be “always on.”
Here are the ten from the book.


I. TIME

    Do Not Be Always On
II. PLACE
    Live in Person
III. CHOICE
    You May Always Choose None of the Above
IV. COMPLEXITY
    You Are Never Completely Right
V. SCALE
   One Size Does Not Fit All
VI. IDENTITY
    Be Yourself
VII. SOCIAL
    Do Not Sell Your Friends
VIII. FACT
    Tell the Truth
IX. OPENNESS
    Share, Don’t Steal
X. PURPOSE
    Program or Be Programmed 

1. MAKE SURE YOU ARE CAUGHT UP ON ALL YOUR BLOG POSTINGS
2. THINK ABOUT THE  FORA.TV DEBATE AND CONSIDER WHAT "SIDE" YOU IDENTIFY MOST WITH (KEEN'S OR RUSHKOFF')

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

RUSHKOFF'S ANSWER TO KEEN

 Discussion of your answers to Questions about Andrew Keen's great seduction:

1. How does Keen's does Keen define Democratized media, and what are his main issues with this trend? use examples from the web in the form of links.

2. Compare and Contrast Keens take on Social Media with Douglas Rushkoff's. Which one speaks to you and your own experiences and why?


  IN CONTRAST TO:

Program or be Programmed

Ten Commands for a Digital Age
Douglas Rushkoff

The Commands are not commandments, meant as orders from God to a population, but rather ways of taking command of any of the biases of digital media. The way to take command of digital media’s asynchronous bias, for example, is not to be “always on.”
Here are the ten from the book.


I. TIME
Do Not Be Always On
II. PLACE
Live in Person
III. CHOICE
You May Always Choose None of the Above
IV. COMPLEXITY
You Are Never Completely Right
V. SCALE
One Size Does Not Fit All
VI. IDENTITY
Be Yourself
VII. SOCIAL
Do Not Sell Your Friends
VIII. FACT
Tell the Truth
IX. OPENNESS
Share, Don’t Steal
X. PURPOSE
Program or Be Programmed


 WATCH:

Web 2.0 "How the Web Ate the Economy and Why it’s Great for Everyone."
Web 2.0 by douglas rushkoff 2009

Next time look at andrew keen's solutions..

Friday, October 8, 2010

The great seduction @ google

mention upcoming schedule (after keen)



Finish Watching andrew keen at google: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lN_n7I0PM3w



For Tuesday I would like you to finish reading the Great Seduction by Andrew Keen and answer the following questions, using the reading and keen's commentary from the google talk as reference points:


1. How does Keen's does Keen define Democratized media, and what are his main issues with this trend? use examples from the web in the form of links.


2. Compare and Contrast Keens take on Social Media with Douglas Rushkoff's. Which one speaks to you and your own experiences and why?












I thought you maybe interested in this: http://www.cinemablend.com/dvds/Catfish-4848.html


Tuesday, October 5, 2010

discussion of commentaries / intro to Andrew Keen

1. I want to discuss some of the things that you Discovered after reading each other's blog postings on digital nation.. I'll Take volunteers or select students to share in class


2. Pass out "The Great Seduction by Andrew Keen"


 3. For Fri th 8th.. I want you to respond to the commentary made on your blog..


4. Have The Great Seduction Read by Tues. the 11th

If we have time we will watch: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lN_n7I0PM3w

keen's blog http://andrewkeen.typepad.com/the_great_seduction/

RELATED MEDIA:
WAS RUTGERS SUICIDE A HATE CRIME
INTERNET RADICALS (AND INTERNET FREEDOMS) FROM CAPITOL HILL

Friday, October 1, 2010

discussion / blog comments---

http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/238643/july-15-2009/douglas-rushkoff
WATCH IN CLASS
RUCHKOFF LIFE INC

1. we will find partners today to start the "Digital Nation" Discussions..

2. Under my direction we will divide into groups of 2-3
3. By the end of class you need to read your partner's essay,  and post their thesis on your blog.. along with your "response thesis"

THIS IS NOT ( http://collegeacb.com/ ) ;)

followed by a in-class discussion..

FOR TUES

RESPOND ( in the comments section of your partner's blog)
should be 1-3 pages
I also want you to read 3 other students postings and make a short response in their comments section..

MAKE SURE YOU INCLUDE YOUR FIRST, LAST NAME, AND A FULL LINK TO YOUR POSTING IN THE COMMENTS